President Donald J. Trump has confirmed reports that he had strong words for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on a recent phone call, over the Israeli leader’s intense attacks on Lebanon.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: In an interview with the Pod Force One podcast, President Donald J. Trump confirmed reports that he rowed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over his attacks on Lebanon, which helped collapse peace talks with Iran. Asked if it was correct that he had told Netanyahu, “Are you f**king crazy,” “What are you f**king doing,” “I helped you stay out of jail,” the President confirmed, “I did.”
📺 DETAIL: Trump said of his remarks to Netanyahu, “I wouldn’t say [I was] angry, I was a little bit perturbed at his constantly fighting with Lebanon, you know? At some point, I said, ‘Bibi, we’ve got to stop this. You’ve got to stop it.'” Axios had reported that Trump told the Israeli leader, “You’d be in prison if it weren’t for me. I’m saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Bibi, we’ve got to stop this. You’ve got to stop it.” – Donald Trump
🎯 IMPACT: The U.S. and Israeli governments have often seemed to have differing goals since the commencement of the U.S.-Israel war with Iran, which Israel extended to Iran’s Hezbollah proxies in Lebanon. An ongoing, shaky ceasefire with Iran was almost collapsed by Israel early on due to Israeli forces continuing operations in Lebanon, which Tehran thought was included in the ceasefire. While President Trump seems set on finalizing a deal with Iran to dismantle its nuclear program and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, Israel seems to have more expansive goals, including effectively annexing a portion of southern Lebanon.
Trump confirms @axios reporting about Netanyahu call
Q: Axios reported that you … said, “Are you F-ing crazy? What are you F-ing doing? I helped you still out of jail”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
President Donald J. Trump has confirmed reports that he had strong words for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on a recent phone call, over the Israeli leader's intense attacks on Lebanon.
An academic paper arguing it is morally justifiable to use genetically modified ticks to spread a potentially life-threatening meat allergy has sparked widespread backlash.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Scientists proposed genetically engineering ticks to induce allergies to red meat in the population in an unearthed study.
📺 DETAIL: In a paper published by Western Michigan University last year, researchers Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth argued that genetically engineering ticks to spread alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) to cause allergies to red meat, in order to create a meat-free society, would be morally justified. The researchers argued that meat consumption is immoral, citing animal suffering and environmental harm. The paper has since been described as just a “thought experiment.” The authors of the paper have clarified that no experiments have been conducted, although they note that it may be possible to cultivate population-wide allergies to red meat in the future. Critics have called the proposal dangerous and arbitrary, criticizing the researchers’ argument that infecting people with a potentially life-threatening disease from tick bites would not violate their rights. AGS is a serious, potentially life-threatening allergy triggered by the consumption of red meat, such as pork, lamb, and beef, and products coming from mammals. AGS symptoms range from mild to severe, spanning mild hives, stomach pain, and anaphylaxis, a condition in which a person’s blood pressure drops rapidly, making it impossible for them to breathe. Between 2017 and 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported roughly 90,000 suspected cases of AGS, with an estimated 15,000 new cases every year. Approximately half a million Americans are suspected of suffering from AGS. There is currently no cure for AGS, and it requires lifelong avoidance of red meat products and several types of medication.
💬 KEY QUOTE:“It is feasible to genetically edit the disease-carrying capacity of ticks. If we are right, then today we have the obligation to research and develop the capacity to proliferate tickborne AGSand, tomorrow, carry out that proliferation,” the paper argues.
📺 FLASHBACK: This story follows a report from late May showing that emergency room (ER) visits caused by tick bites had skyrocketed from 39 per 100,000 to 137 per 100,000. The data covers ER visits between March and April in ten Midwest states. In response to the findings, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced a new effort to treat tick-borne diseases, including AGS.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
An academic paper arguing it is morally justifiable to use genetically modified ticks to spread a potentially life-threatening meat allergy has sparked widespread backlash.
The Supreme Court’s decision to permit Alabama’s redistricted map in the November midterms could be a huge blow to the Democrats.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court granted Alabama’s request to use its redistricted 2023 congressional map for the 2026 midterm elections, which eliminates a racially gerrymandered, Democrat-voting district. This halts a lower court’s injunction that had blocked the map, alleging it violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting black voting power.
📺 DETAIL: The ruling follows the Court’s April 2026 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which found that elements of the Voting Rights Act requiring states to create “majority minority” electoral districts—which typically vote Democrat—are unconstitutional. Democrat leaders and liberal justices attacked the decision, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor arguing that not creating districts with bizarre geography in order to artificially ensure black majorities amounts to discrimination. Notably, Alabama’s map still retains one majority-black district.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Before the Court are two paths. Down one lies an orderly election… Down the other lies a chaotic election, held under a never-before-used congressional map that intentionally discriminates against Black Alabamians.” – Justice Sonia Sotomayor
🎯 IMPACT: The decision underscores the Supreme Court’s seeming intention to broadly restrict racial gerrymandering under the Voting Rights Act. Republican-led state legislatures in several Southern states have been moving to redraw their electoral maps in light of Louisiana v. Callais, potentially costing Democrats a decisive number of House seatsin the November midterms.
For one brief moment the federal government proposed to do something it almost never does, which is to concede that its own machinery had been turned into a weapon and to offer the people it crushed a route to redress. The now infamous Anti-Weaponization Fund was seeded with a deliberately symbolic $1.776 billion drawn from the Judgment Fund under the settlement of the President’s suit over his own leaked tax returns.
That is precisely what they moved to crush it.
A single federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia froze the fund within days, with a hearing on whether to extend the block set for 12 June, and the same establishment that spent a decade swearing the agencies were neutral suddenly located deep constitutional misgivings about compensating the agencies’ victims.
Democratic governors and legislators raced to smother any payout that survived the courts, with Gavin Newsom even vowing to tax California recipients at 100 percent and copycat bills appearing in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Wisconsin, alongside a federal measure its own authors were proud enough to brand the SLUSH FUND Act. That this single idea provoked so much coordinated outrage is a massive tell.
Stephen K. Bannon was wrongly prosecuted and imprisoned over a congressional subpoena of the precise kind that, aimed the other way, yields a sternly worded letter and nothing further. Peter Navarro also went to prison. Michael Flynn was put through years of an investigation that the government’s own records later showed it had cause to drop long before it chose to.
And there are a number of cases that never reach cable news. We at The National Pulse have heard testimony from a number of people who have reached out to us to explain how they were persecuted, having assets seized, their homes raided, placed on no fly lists. Some of these cases are still unresolved.
White River Energy Corp is another example. A small Arkansas oil and gas firm which built a business around Native American sovereign tax credits. Its filings were processed without incident until one of its referral agents, Billy Long, was nominated to run the IRS, at which point it became a target of convenience.
The company maintains the credits are legitimate, but what followed was not quiet enforcement but a public campaign, with Senator Ron Wyden firing off letters demanding a Justice Department investigation and branding the arrangement a fraud in the press, after which the agency’s posture conveniently hardened. All because Wyden wanted to stop Billy Long. For White River, however, the damage is done.
The pattern here is precisely the point. The pressure didn’t begin inside a neutral tax administration applying the code without fear or favor; it began with a U.S. Senator hunting a political scalp, amplified by a sympathetic press, and it landed on people with neither the profile nor the war chest to fight back.
It is more than fair to ask how impartial that administration is. We know, because she posted it herself, that a serving IRS Appeals Officer – Niki Wilkinson – used her own public LinkedIn account to defend a central figure from the Lois Lerner-era targeting scandal, to dismiss congressional concern about political bias as a “farce,” and to accuse the sitting President of corruption, all while occupying a role whose entire legitimacy rests on the appearance of neutrality.
While many outlets have reported that Wilkinson was fired from the IRS, it remains unclear as to whether she simply got demoted, instead.
A tax authority cannot demand that citizens trust its impartiality while its officers editorialize against half the country on a public social media feed.
This is exactly why the fund was right, and why letting it die would be a lasting mistake. Weaponization cannot be resolved by waiting for the offending officials to retire on their whopping full pensions. As we have previously said, the people must be compensated, and the next politician who reaches for the IRS or any government agency as a campaign instrument must know that the bill eventually arrives.
show less
For one brief moment the federal government proposed to do something it almost never does, which is to concede that its own machinery had been turned into a weapon and to offer the people it crushed a route to redress. The now infamous Anti-Weaponization Fund was seeded with a deliberately symbolic $1.776 billion drawn from the Judgment Fund under the settlement of the President's suit over his own leaked tax returns.
The murder and wrongful arrest of white teenager Henry Nowak have sparked demands to abolish institutionalized Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) ideology in British policing, amid growing concerns that it has created a “two-tier” justice system.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Police forces across the United Kingdom have come under increased pressure to scrap Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies following the murder and wrongful arrest of white teenager Henry Nowak.
📰 DETAIL: On Tuesday, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage called for the arrest of 18-year-old Henry Nowak while he was dying from multiple stab wounds a “watershed moment” that should lead to the overturning of the “anti-white” and “two-tier” culture in British policing. Farage emphasized the priorities of the police, who ignored Nowal’s pleas for medical aid because murderer Vickrum Digwa falsely claimed he had been racist, noting that the accusation of racism was treated as more urgent than an accusation of attempted murder. In an article for The Telegraph, Farage wrote that DEI had created a “two-tier culture where some groups receive greater protection than others.” In the House of Commons on Wednesday, he also highlighted the National Police Chiefs’ Council’s Police Anti-Racism Commitment, which states explicitly that ethnic groups should be treated differently, not equally,in order to achieve “racial equity.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We must end the anti-white prejudice that has been allowed to fester. We must assert, without apology, that White lives matter too. DEI initiatives and positive discrimination must be scrapped. No ifs, no buts. – Nigel Farage
🎯 IMPACT: In response to growing public pressure, the National Police Chiefs’ Council is reviewing its anti-racism guidelines. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, urged to end two-tier policing by Farage in the House of Commons on Wednesday, denied that it exists, but his spokesman later said of the clearly two-tier nature of the Police Anti-Racism Commitment, “We don’t think that language is right.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
The murder and wrongful arrest of white teenager Henry Nowak have sparked demands to abolish institutionalized Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) ideology in British policing, amid growing concerns that it has created a "two-tier" justice system.
A BBC presenter has issued an apology to Nigel Farage after falsely claiming that the Reform UK leader called for “white cold rage” in response to white teenager Henry Nowak’s murder and wrongful arrest.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A BBC presenter has apologized for misquoting Reform UK leader Nigel Farage’s response to Henry Nowak’s murder by Vickrum Digwa and wrongful arrest by the police.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I owe Nigel Farage an apology.During last night’s Newsnight we covered the murder of Henry Nowak and the political reaction to the case, including discussing Nigel Farage’s comments about ‘pure, cold rage’. However I referred to ‘white cold rage’. This was a mistake on my part… I apologise to Nigel Farage for this.” – Matt Chorley, presenter on BBC’s Newsnight
🎯 IMPACT: The misquoting of Farage, which appeared to imply a white nationalist motive for Farage’s call to action against “anti-white prejudice” after police roughly arrested Henry Nowak as he was dying instead of helping him, because his murderer alleged he had been racist, has led to calls for an investigation into the publicly-funded broadcaster. Reform’s Shadow Home Secretary, Zia Yusuf, accused Chorley of trying to “defame Nigel and lie to the country.” Farage said his legal team has “written to the BBC demanding a full on air apologyand investigation into the defamatory comments made about me on Newsnight.”
📰 DETAIL: On Tuesday, in response to Nowak’s murder and wrongful arrest, Farage issued an emergency broadcast, saying that the British people should feel “pure, cold rage” over the actions of the police and the family of Vickrum Digwa. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer accused Farage of “exploiting” the murder and deniedhis claims of “two-tier policing” in Britain, despite a Police Anti-Racism Commitment clearly stating that ethnic groups should be treated differently to achieve “equality of policing outcomes.”
I owe Nigel Farage an apology.
During last night’s Newsnight we covered the murder of Henry Nowak and the political reaction to the case, including discussing Nigel Farage’s comments about “pure, cold rage”.
However I referred to “white cold rage”. This was a mistake on my…
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
A BBC presenter has issued an apology to Nigel Farage after falsely claiming that the Reform UK leader called for "white cold rage" in response to white teenager Henry Nowak's murder and wrongful arrest.
Keir Starmer and Nigel Farage clash over policing and protests in the House of Commons following the murder of white teenager Henry Nowak by a Sikh man.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer addressed the House of Commons on Wednesday on the murder of white teenager Henry Nowak by Vickrum Digwa, attacking protesters who demonstrated outside Southampton Central Police Station and near the Digwa family residence on Tuesday and warning that anyone involved in disorder will face the “full force” of the British state. He adopted a similarly draconian approach in response to protesters against the Southport murders, with people arrested and imprisoned for as little as posting on social media.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This is a time for serious work, not rage. And let me be clear, we will ensure anyone found engaging in disorder meets the full force of the law, as we have done before.” – Keir Starmer
📰 DETAIL: Starmer implied that those protesting the murder of Nowak, who was handcuffed by police officers as he was dying instead of being helped because his murderer falsely alleged he was racist, are unserious. His comments that it is not a time for “rage” came in response to Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage, who said the incident highlighted cultural and institutional issues of “anti-white prejudice” and should be met with “pure, cold rage.”
🎯 IMPACT: Starmer also denied Farage’s accusations of “two-tier policing” in Britain, but was forced to acknowledge the existence of a Police Anti-Racism Commitment that explicitly states that different ethnicities should be treated differently to produce “equality of policing outcomes for people from different ethnic groups,” arguing that “racial equity” does notmean “treating everyone ‘the same’ or being ‘colour blind’ (racial equality).”
🚨 WATCH: Keir Starmer condemns the attacks on police in Southampton last night
“This is a time of serious work, not rage… anyone found engaging in disorder will meet the full force of the law” #PMQspic.twitter.com/hyzsjpF3XR
Join Pulse to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
Keir Starmer and Nigel Farage clash over policing and protests in the House of Commons following the murder of white teenager Henry Nowak by a Sikh man.
The White House Correspondents’ Dinner will return with enhanced security measures after being disrupted earlier this year by an assassination attempt against President Donald J. Trump.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) has announced thatits annual dinner will take place next monthafter being postponed following a failed assassination attempt against President Donald J. Trump.
📺 DETAIL: The upcoming event has been scheduled for July 24 in Washington, D.C.No venue has been confirmed at this time. The President has confirmed that he will attend. “In a sign of strength and fortitude, it was just announced that The White House Correspondents’ Dinner, which violently ended rather abruptly on April 25th, will be rescheduled to July 24th. This announcement is a very good thing in that we cannot allow Lunatics to change our way of life, or even its scheduling. I was asked to be there, and speak, by Weijia Jiang, President of The White House Correspondents’ Association, and have accepted,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. The dinner is also set to be attended by various journalists, officials, and political figures. The event willinclude tighter security measures following the failed assassination attempt against Trump during the original event earlier in the year.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It will be a statement that violence has no place in American life and a free press will not be intimidated into silence… We will not allow an act of violence to have the last word… This dinner will not only be an opportunity to carry out our program. It will be a statement that violence has no place in American life and a free press will not be intimidated into silence.” – WHCA President Weijia Jiang
📺 FLASHBACK: The original WHCA dinner was postponed after 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen allegedly attempted to assassinate President Trump and other senior officials at the event. This was the third attempt on the President’s life. Allen faces multiple charges, including the attempted assassination of the President of the United States, punishable by up to life imprisonment, as well as interstate transportation of a firearm to commit a felony and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence.
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 2, 2026
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
The White House Correspondents' Dinner will return with enhanced security measures after being disrupted earlier this year by an assassination attempt against President Donald J. Trump.
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, hit back at attempts by the British political establishment to depoliticize the murder and wrongful arrest of 18-year-old white student Henry Nowak.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, laid out the political significance of the murder and wrongful arrest of Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old white student in Southampton, England, as protesters descended on the city.
📺 DETAIL: In a video interview with Human Events’ Jack Posobiec on Real America’s Voice (link here), Kassam stressed that Nowak’s killing is “the biggest story in the UK right now, full stop,” with a large protest near the family home of his Sikh murderer, Vickrum Digwa, ongoing as of the time of publication. “It’s not just the fact that there was this heinous, brutal, disgusting stabbing that took place, it’s every little detail seems to make it worse—and we’re not even at the end of this whole thing yet,” Kassam said. Notably, the Digwa family called the police rather than an ambulance for Nowak, claiming falsely that he had been racist and denying that he had been stabbed. Officers told Nowak, pleading for an ambulance and saying he could not breathe, that they did not believe he had been stabbed, manhandling him into a pair of handcuffs and reading him his rights. He passed out and died moments later. Kassam emphasized, “Henry Nowak is by no means the first person this has happened to,” noting how differently Nowak’s case has been treated from that of George Floyd, for whom Keir Starmer, now Prime Minister, took the knee in 2020.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “They now and try and tell us Henry Nowak’s death is not political, and it shouldn’t be made political. Henry Nowak’s death wasnecessarily political.The cultural proposition that is being made in the United Kingdom right now is necessarily political. The way in which the police responded to him, because of the false racism charge leveled at him. The DEI cops were being necessarily political in the way that they dealt with this… This is a political event, it is a political death, and it will be dealt with in the hard arena of politics.” – Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse.
🎯 IMPACT: “A lot of people in [America] ask me, ‘When will the British lion start to roar again?’ Today,” Kassam predicted, highlighting the protest in Southampton at the city’s central police station, which later moved towards the Digwa family residence, and a Tuesday morning emergency address by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, who said the public should react to the scandal with “cold rage.”
📺 WATCH: Kassam’s remarks can be seen in full here.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, hit back at attempts by the British political establishment to depoliticize the murder and wrongful arrest of 18-year-old white student Henry Nowak.
President Donald J. Trump has signed an executive order on voluntary government access to advanced AI models prior to release, aiming to bolster cybersecurity and national security.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trumpsigned an executive order on Tuesday requiring AI companies to grant the federal government early access to their most advanced models for voluntary testing. The order aims to ensure AI systems are vetted for safety and security risks before deployment while avoiding mandatory licensing requirements.
📺 DETAIL: The order directs agencies, including the Pentagon, Treasury Department, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), to strengthen protections for critical infrastructure and work with leading AI companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google on voluntary safety evaluations. Under the plan, companies may provide the government access to cutting-edge AI models up to 30 days before release, allowing officials to assess potential security risks. The order also creates an AI cybersecurity clearinghouse to share information on software vulnerabilities and directs the Justice Department to prioritize prosecutions involving AI-related cybercrime and the misuse of autonomous AI systems. The measure follows months of development and comes as policymakers grapple with the national security implications of increasingly powerful AI technologies.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Advanced AI capabilities make our Nation stronger, but also introduce new national security considerations that require coordinated actionacross executive departments and agencies,” the executive order states.
🎯 IMPACT: The order underscores the administration’s concerns around balancing innovation with security. It also reflects growing concerns about AI’s potential vulnerabilities and the need for proactive measures to protect critical infrastructure.
📺 FLASHBACK: The executive order was initially planned for May but was delayed after Trump expressed concerns about hindering U.S. companies’ ability to compete with China.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
President Donald J. Trump has signed an executive order on voluntary government access to advanced AI models prior to release, aiming to bolster cybersecurity and national security.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.